Low-fat
study leaves little to chew on
Study of older women shows
little effect on disease rates
CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) --
Judy LaCour has spent more than 10 years cutting out fat
in her diet in a mammoth government study that no one
involved wants to call a bust.
And yet, after spending
$415 million trying to get nearly 20,000 mostly
overweight postmenopausal women to radically change
their eating habits in hopes of reducing cancer and
heart disease, researchers are acknowledging less than
spectacular results.
After an average of roughly
eight years, there was little difference in rates of
breast cancer, colorectal cancer and heart disease in
women who reduced their fat consumption than among
nearly 30,000 study participants who didn't)
"I was surprised," LaCour,
66, a Seattle-area participant, said. "I thought there
would be more definitive answers about the value of the
low-fat diet."
The researchers did, too.
Even so, scientists say the results don't mean dieters
should just throw up their hands and eat cake.
Researchers suggested that
the participants -- with an average age of 62 -- may
have started their healthy eating too late. They also
didn't reduce fats as much as the diet demanded. And
while some initially lost a few pounds, the diet was not
designed for weight loss and most remained overweight, a
major risk factor for cancer and heart problems.
The results appear in
Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.
Heart and cancer
specialists said the overall results were not surprising
since scientific thinking on the role different fats
play in disease prevention has evolved since this study
was designed.
The diet "focused on
reduction in total fat and did not differentiate between
the so-called good fats and bad fats," said Dr.
Elizabeth Nabel, director of the National Heart, Lung
and Blood Institute, the study's sponsor.
Reducing "bad" fats
including saturated and trans fats found in processed
and fried foods, and increasing consumption of "good
fats" including olive oil, might have yielded better
results, especially for heart disease, the researchers
and other scientists said.
"These results do not
suggest that people have carte blanche to eat fatty
foods without health problems," said Dr. JoAnn Manson,
chief of preventive medicine at Harvard's Brigham and
Women's Hospital, a co-author of the study.
The researchers declined to
call the venture a failure, pointing to signs of less
breast cancer in women who cut out the most fat, and in
less heart disease in women who ate low amounts of
unhealthy fats.
Still, Manson said, the
results "are somewhat disappointing. We would have liked
this dietary intervention to have a major impact on
health."
The diet-group women cut
overall fat consumption and increased vegetables, fruits
and grains. The other group continued their usual eating
habits.
The study is part of the
Women's Health Initiative, a landmark government project
involving tens of thousands of postmenopausal U.S.
women. An earlier WHI study linked long-term use of
hormone pills with breast cancer and heart disease
risks.
The new study was designed
mainly to investigate breast cancer risk. Dietary fat
was initially thought to be implicated because breast
cancer rates are high in Western countries with fatty
diets, but recent studies have failed to show any
relationship, said Dr. Michael Thun of the American
Cancer Society.
Recent research also has
suggested that for breast cancer in particular, earlier
eating habits may have the most influence on risk.
Another target was colon cancer, which some studies have
linked with red meat.
Breast cancer rates in both
groups were about 3 percent, marginally higher than for
postmenopausal women in the general U.S. population,
probably because these women got routine mammograms,
said study investigator Ross Prentice of the Fred
Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Colon cancer rates in
both groups were similar to national rates for similarly
aged women -- roughly 1 percent in both groups.
Both groups had relatively
low rates of heart disease, about 2.5 percent compared
with just over 4 percent among postmenopausal women
nationally, Prentice said.